2026年、勝つコンテンツは量ではなく、最も代替不可能なコンテンツです。AIが汎用的なブログ記事やSNSキャプションを数秒で生成できる今、人間が作るコンテンツの基準はかつてないほど高くなっています。この8つのプロンプトは、AI Overviewで要約しきれない切り口の発見、1つのコンテンツから15以上のプラットフォーム向けアセットへの展開、100点満点のルーブリックに基づく既存コンテンツの採点、そして顧客の実際の話し方を反映したコピー作成を支援します。すべてのプロンプトは、カレンダーを埋めるためではなく、注目を勝ち取るコンテンツを作るために設計されています。
プロンプト
AEO防御力スコア付きの差別化された切り口を発見
I need unique content angles for: [topic/product/service] Target audience: [who they are, their pain points, what they've already read] My brand voice: [describe tone] My unique advantage: [what makes your perspective different — data access, experience, methodology] What competitors are saying: [paste 3-5 competitor headlines or angles] AI Overview result for this topic: [paste what Google's AI Overview shows, if applicable] Deliver: 1. 10 UNIQUE CONTENT ANGLES ranked by differentiation potential For each angle: - Headline (under 60 chars, scroll-stopping) - Core argument in 2 sentences - Why it resonates with [audience] specifically - AEO defensibility score (1-10): can an AI Overview fully summarize this angle? If 7+, it's defensible. If below 5, AI can replace it. 2. TOP 3 ANGLES — expanded: - Content format recommendation (long-form / thread / video / data study / interactive) - Distribution strategy (where to publish first, where to repurpose) - What original data, experience, or expertise makes this un-copyable - Estimated competitive difficulty vs. potential traffic 3. CONTRARIAN TAKE - One bold angle that directly challenges industry conventional wisdom - The evidence or logic that supports it - Risk assessment: provocative enough to get shared, but defensible enough to withstand pushback 4. CONTENT SERIES CONCEPT - Connect 4-5 angles into a narrative arc that builds authority over time - Publishing cadence and platform strategy - How the series creates a reason to follow/subscribe
プロのコツ
AIに3つの競合見出しとターゲットキーワードのAI Overview結果を入力しましょう。競合がカバーしていない、かつAI要約が完全に抽出できない切り口を見つけてくれます—そこがコンテンツに真の持続力がある最適ポイントです。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
1つのコンテンツを15以上のプラットフォームネイティブアセットに同時変換
Repurpose this content across every relevant platform. Original content: [Paste blog post, video transcript, podcast notes, or long-form content] My platforms and audience sizes: - LinkedIn: [followers] - Twitter/X: [followers] - Instagram: [followers] - Email list: [subscribers, open rate] - YouTube: [subscribers] (if applicable) - TikTok: [followers] (if applicable) Repurpose into: 1. LINKEDIN (3 posts) - Post 1: Story hook — personal narrative + lesson - Post 2: Data/insight hook — surprising finding from the content - Post 3: Hot take hook — contrarian angle that drives comments - Each post: full text, hashtags, CTA, best day/time to post 2. TWITTER/X (2 threads + 5 standalone tweets) - Thread 1: Educational breakdown (8-10 tweets) - Thread 2: Story-driven narrative (6-8 tweets) - 5 standalone tweets: quotes, stats, questions from the content 3. EMAIL NEWSLETTER - Subject line (3 options with A/B testing rationale) - Preview text - Full newsletter draft (400-600 words, conversational) - CTA aligned with business goal 4. INSTAGRAM - Carousel outline (8-10 slides with text for each) - 3 Reels concepts (15-30 seconds each, with visual direction) - Caption for each with relevant hashtags 5. SHORT-FORM VIDEO (TikTok/Reels/Shorts) - 3 scripts (30-60 seconds each) - Hook in first 2 seconds - Visual direction and text overlay suggestions - Trending audio/format suggestions for the content type 6. PULL QUOTES & SHAREABLE ASSETS - 5 quotable one-liners for social sharing - 3 data visualizations or stat cards to create - Key takeaway formatted as an infographic outline
プロのコツ
各プラットフォームのフォロワー数とエンゲージメント率を指定しましょう。フォロワー500人のLinkedInアカウントと5万人のアカウントでは異なる戦術が必要です—各スケールでエンゲージメントの仕組みが変わるため、オーディエンスサイズを知るとAIの書き方が大きく変わります。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
プラットフォームと目的別にランク付けされた25のスクロール停止フック
I need compelling hooks for content about: [topic] Target audience: [who they are and what keeps them up at night] Platform: [LinkedIn / Twitter / Instagram / Email / Blog / Video] Goal: [educate / sell / build authority / drive traffic / grow followers] Tone: [professional / casual / provocative / inspirational / empathetic] My unique angle: [what I know or have access to that others don't] Generate 25 hooks in 5 categories: 1. CURIOSITY GAP HOOKS (5) - Open a loop the reader can't help but want closed - Each should make someone think 'wait, what?' 2. DATA/PROOF HOOKS (5) - Lead with a specific, surprising number or finding - Suggest real data sources I could verify and cite - The number should challenge what the reader assumes 3. STORY HOOKS (5) - Open with a specific moment, not a generic scenario - No 'imagine this' or 'picture yourself' — drop into action - Each should be a micro-story completable in 2 sentences 4. CONTRARIAN HOOKS (5) - Challenge conventional wisdom in my industry - State the popular belief, then break it - Each should be defensible, not just provocative for clicks 5. OUTCOME HOOKS (5) - Promise a specific, measurable result - Include a timeframe or constraint that adds credibility - 'How I [specific result] in [timeframe] with [constraint]' Then: - Rank all 25 from strongest to weakest with reasoning - Tag each with best platform fit (some hooks work on LinkedIn but die on Twitter) - Flag which hooks need a visual/image to work vs. text-only - Identify the 3 hooks most likely to drive comments/replies
プロのコツ
トップ3のフックをコンテンツに使う前にメール件名としてテストしましょう。メール開封率で実際にどのフックがスクロールを止めるかの実データが得られます。ほとんどのマーケターはどのフックが効くか推測していますが、既存のメールリストで無料でテストできます。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
既存コンテンツを採点し、必要な作業量を正確に把握
Score this content and tell me the exact rewrite level needed. Content: [paste full text] Content type: [blog post / landing page / email / social post / guide] Target keyword: [primary keyword, if applicable] Business goal: [rank on Google / convert visitors / build authority / generate shares] Target audience: [who this is for] Original publish date: [when] Current performance: [traffic, rankings, conversion rate — whatever you have] Score across 4 dimensions (each out of 25, total out of 100): 1. RELEVANCE & ANGLE (25 pts) - Does this address what the audience actually needs right now? - Is the angle differentiated from competitors? - Is the core argument clear within the first 200 words? - Are there outdated references, stats, or advice? 2. CONTENT QUALITY (25 pts) - Depth vs. fluff ratio — how much is genuine insight vs. filler? - Original value: data, frameworks, case studies, first-hand experience - E-E-A-T signals: author expertise evident? Citations present? Real examples? - Voice quality: does this sound like an expert or a content mill? 3. STRUCTURE & UX (25 pts) - Heading hierarchy: logical, keyword-informed, scannable - Paragraph length and readability - CTA clarity and placement - Visual elements: does this need images, charts, or examples? 4. SEO & DISTRIBUTION (25 pts) - Keyword optimization (title, H1, meta, body) - Internal and external links - Schema opportunity - Shareability: would someone send this to a colleague? Classify rewrite level: - **Light Touch (80-100):** Minor tweaks — update stats, improve a headline, add 1-2 internal links - **Moderate (65-79):** Restructure + add 2-3 new sections, update examples, improve SEO - **Major (40-64):** Significant rewrite keeping best parts — new angle, expanded depth, fresh structure - **Complete (<40):** Start fresh — the topic is worth targeting but this content isn't salvageable For each dimension: specific fixes with before → after examples
プロのコツ
新しいコンテンツを作る前に、トップ10のコンテンツでこれを実行しましょう。ほとんどのマーケターは、優れたコンテンツの60%まで完成しているのにページ3に埋もれているコンテンツを抱えています。権威性とバックリンクのある既存コンテンツの2時間のリライトは、ゼロから始める新規コンテンツを毎回上回ります。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
あらゆるコピー形式向けのコンバージョン対応ブリーフを作成
Build a complete copywriting brief for: [type: landing page / ad / email sequence / sales page / product description] Product/service: [what you're selling] Price point: [cost and what's included] Target customer: [demographics, psychographics, current situation] Main pain point: [the specific problem your product solves] Main objection: [the #1 reason they don't buy] Competitors: [who else solves this problem and how you're different] Social proof: [testimonials, case studies, numbers you can reference] Deliver: 1. CUSTOMER AVATAR - Detailed paragraph: who they are, what they're feeling, what they've tried that didn't work - Their internal dialogue when they find your page - The transformation they want (before state → after state) 2. MESSAGING HIERARCHY - Primary value proposition (one sentence, crystal clear) - 3 supporting benefit statements with proof points - 3 objection-handling responses (address specific hesitations) 3. FULL COPY DRAFT - Headline (3 options: benefit-led, curiosity-led, proof-led) - Subheadline that qualifies the audience - Body copy following PAS (Problem-Agitation-Solution) or AIDA framework - Social proof section with specific formatting - CTA (3 options: direct, soft, urgency-based) - Guarantee/risk-reversal statement 4. A/B TEST PLAN - 2 alternative headline/CTA combinations - What each test isolates (messaging vs. urgency vs. social proof) - Success metric and minimum sample size to reach significance
プロのコツ
プロンプトに実際の顧客の声やサポートチケットを1つ含めましょう。AIは実際の顧客の言語パターンを反映し、マーケターが書いたようではなく、購入者が話すように聞こえるコピーを生成します。最高のコピーは、見込み客自身の言葉で彼らに売り込みます。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
4つのアンカーピースを中心とした30日間の戦略的コンテンツ
Build a strategic 30-day content calendar for my brand. Brand/business: [what you do] Platforms and posting frequency: - [Platform 1]: [X times per week] - [Platform 2]: [X times per week] - [Platform 3]: [X times per week] Content pillars: [3-5 themes you want to be known for] Business goals this month: [launch / awareness / leads / sales / community growth] Upcoming events or dates: [product launches, holidays, industry events] Team/resources: [solo creator / small team / agency — who makes the content] Biggest constraint: [time / ideas / consistency / distribution] Deliver: 1. 4 ANCHOR PIECES (one per week) - Long-form content that demonstrates expertise - Target keyword and search intent for each - How each anchor piece feeds derivative content for the week 2. 30-DAY CALENDAR GRID - Specific topic and format for every post on every platform - Content type mix: 40% educational, 25% storytelling, 20% engagement, 15% promotional - Which posts are original vs. repurposed from anchor pieces - Themed days or recurring series that build audience habits 3. PRODUCTION SCHEDULE - Batch creation days: when to write, film, design - Scheduling days: when to queue everything up - Engagement blocks: when to reply and interact - Time estimate per content piece 4. CONTINGENCY PLAN - 5 'evergreen' posts ready to fill gaps when you fall behind - Which posts to skip if you're short on time (and which to never skip) - How to repurpose one week's anchor into the next week's lighter content 5. SUCCESS METRICS - What to track per platform (not vanity metrics) - Weekly check-in: which post types to do more/less of based on data - Month-end review template
プロのコツ
まず4つのアンカーピース(週1つ)を中心にカレンダーを構築し、その周りに派生コンテンツを埋めましょう。ほとんどのクリエイターは逆にやります—コンテンツの骨格なしに毎日の投稿を計画すると、どのトピックでも権威を築けないランダムで断片的なコンテンツになります。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
クライアントの成果を押し売りしない売れるストーリーに変換
Write a case study from these details. Client/customer: [industry, company size, role of decision maker — name if permitted] Their situation before: [what was broken, missing, or costing them] What they tried first: [solutions that didn't work and why] Our solution: [what you did, step by step] Results: [specific metrics, timeline, and ongoing impact] Client quote: [direct quote if available — even a rough paraphrase helps] Deliver: 1. HEADLINE OPTIONS (3) - Lead with the result, not the company name - Include a specific metric in the headline - Under 80 characters 2. FULL CASE STUDY (600-800 words) - Problem → Failed Attempts → Solution → Results → What's Next format - Written as a narrative, not a report — the reader should feel the frustration and relief - Specific enough to be credible, general enough for prospects in similar situations to self-identify 3. DERIVATIVE ASSETS - 2-sentence summary for the website portfolio page - LinkedIn post announcing the case study (with the most compelling stat as the hook) - 3 pull quotes formatted for social media graphics - Email snippet to use in sales follow-ups - Slide content for a sales deck (problem/solution/result in 3 slides) 4. SALES ENABLEMENT - 3 specific objections this case study addresses - Which stage of the sales funnel this case study is most powerful - How to reference it in a cold email (one sentence) - How to bring it up in a sales call (conversational script)
プロのコツ
小さく見える数字でも具体的な数字を含めましょう。「90日間で23%向上」は「大幅な改善」よりも信頼性があり説得力があります。曖昧な結果は読者に何かを隠していると思わせます。正確な数字がない場合は、範囲や相対的な改善を使いましょう。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
AI Overviewに完全に代替されないコンテンツを確保
Analyze this content for AI-replacement vulnerability. My content: [paste full text] Target keyword: [primary keyword] Google's AI Overview for this keyword: [paste if available] Content format: [blog post / guide / landing page / resource] Business goal: [what this content needs to achieve] Run this analysis: 1. AI OVERVIEW VULNERABILITY SCAN - Which sections of my content could be fully summarized by an AI Overview? - Which sections contain information AI cannot generate (original data, first-hand experience, proprietary methodology)? - Overall vulnerability score: what percentage of this content's value can AI Overviews replicate? 2. DEFENSIBILITY AUDIT For each section, rate defensibility (High / Medium / Low): - High: original research, proprietary data, personal experience, unique methodology - Medium: curated expertise, specific examples, industry-specific nuance - Low: commonly available information, generic advice, definitions, basic how-tos 3. HARDENING RECOMMENDATIONS For every Low-defensibility section: - Specific way to inject original value (add a case study, share personal results, introduce a framework, cite proprietary data) - What to add that AI literally cannot fabricate - Whether to cut the section entirely if it can't be hardened 4. STRUCTURAL AI-PROOFING - Are key insights buried in paragraphs (easy to extract) or woven into narrative (hard to extract)? - Does the content structure reward reading the full piece, or can someone get 90% of the value from skimming? - Interactive elements, tools, or templates that can't be replicated in a text summary 5. REVISED CONTENT STRATEGY - Which 3 changes would most improve this content's defensibility? - What type of original content (data study, survey, expert interviews) would make this the definitive resource? - Is this keyword still worth targeting, or should you pivot to a less AI-vulnerable angle?
プロのコツ
ターゲットキーワードを今すぐGoogleで検索し、AI Overviewが表示されるか確認しましょう。表示される場合、そのAI Overviewをコンテンツと一緒にこのプロンプトに貼り付けてください。AIが、Overviewが既にカバーしている部分(低価値セクション)と、あなたにしかないもの(あなたの競争優位)を正確に教えてくれます。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
実際のテストに基づいています — 推測ではありません。 テスト方法を見る
Gemini 2.5 Pro
構造化されたコンテンツプランニング、カレンダー、リパーパスワークフローに最適。現実的な制作スケジュールを作成し、クロスプラットフォームの機会を具体的に特定します。感情に訴えるナラティブコピーは弱め—戦略にはGemini、執筆にはモデルを切り替えましょう。
プランニング最適GPT-4.1
コンバージョン重視のコピー、フック生成、自然なクロスプラットフォームコンテンツに最適。LinkedInのフォーマルさとTwitterの簡潔さの間のトーン切り替えが他のどのモデルよりも優れています。ケーススタディとセールスコピーに強い。冗長で定型的になりがち—文字数制限を指定し、企業スピークを排除するよう指示しましょう。
コピー最適Claude Sonnet 4
コンテンツスコアリング、AEO防御力分析、真に独自の切り口発見に最適。コンテンツが本当に価値を追加しているか、既出の情報を繰り返しているだけかについて最も正直な評価を提供します。AIで代替不可能なコンテンツの特定に優れています。
スコアリング最適Grok 3
逆張りの切り口、エッジの効いたフック、AIっぽくない独特の声のコンテンツに最適。その率直さは、他のどのモデルよりも汎用的なマーケティング用語を排除します。混雑したニッチでの使い古された切り口の特定に強い。B2Bブランドにはカジュアルすぎる場合があります。
逆張り切り口最適トピックではなく、変化から始めましょう。何かを書く前に、この文を完成させてください:「このコンテンツを読んだ後、読者はXをやめてYを始める」。この文を埋められないなら、それはコンテンツではなくフィラーです。トピックだけでなく、明確な変化の目標を与えると、AIの出力は劇的に向上します。
長文から短文へリパーパスし、その逆は避けましょう。週に1つの深く権威あるアンカーコンテンツ(ブログ記事、動画、ポッドキャスト)を作り、マルチプラットフォームリパーパサーで10〜15の派生コンテンツを生成します。逆方向—ツイートを記事に拡張する—では深みのない薄いコンテンツになります。
公開前に必ずスコアリングしましょう。公開前にすべてのコンテンツをコンテンツスコアラーで評価してください。10分のスコアリングで、ページ1にランクインするコンテンツと消えていくコンテンツを分ける汎用的なフィラー、CTAの欠落、SEOのギャップを発見できます。