2026 年,能勝出的內容不是最多的——而是最不可替代的。AI 可以在幾秒內產生泛泛的部落格文章和社群標題,這意味著人類創建的內容門檻前所未有地高。這 8 個提示詞幫你找到 AI 概覽無法摘要的角度、將一篇內容再利用為 15 個以上的平台原生素材、依 100 分制評量表為現有內容評分,以及建立能轉換的文案,因為它鏡像了你客戶實際的說話方式。每個提示詞都是為了創建能贏得注意力而非只是填滿行事曆的內容。
| 您想做的事 |
|---|
| 發現具 AEO 防禦性評分的差異化角度 |
| 將一篇內容同時轉化為 15 個以上的平台原生素材 |
| 依平台和目標排名的 25 個吸睛引言 |
| 為現有內容評分,精確知道需要多少工作量 |
| 為任何文案格式建立轉換導向的簡報 |
| 圍繞 4 個錨點內容建立 30 天策略性內容計畫 |
| 將客戶成果轉化為不推銷卻能賣的故事 |
| 確保你的內容無法被 AI 概覽完全取代 |
提示詞
發現具 AEO 防禦性評分的差異化角度
I need unique content angles for: [topic/product/service] Target audience: [who they are, their pain points, what they've already read] My brand voice: [describe tone] My unique advantage: [what makes your perspective different — data access, experience, methodology] What competitors are saying: [paste 3-5 competitor headlines or angles] AI Overview result for this topic: [paste what Google's AI Overview shows, if applicable] Deliver: 1. 10 UNIQUE CONTENT ANGLES ranked by differentiation potential For each angle: - Headline (under 60 chars, scroll-stopping) - Core argument in 2 sentences - Why it resonates with [audience] specifically - AEO defensibility score (1-10): can an AI Overview fully summarize this angle? If 7+, it's defensible. If below 5, AI can replace it. 2. TOP 3 ANGLES — expanded: - Content format recommendation (long-form / thread / video / data study / interactive) - Distribution strategy (where to publish first, where to repurpose) - What original data, experience, or expertise makes this un-copyable - Estimated competitive difficulty vs. potential traffic 3. CONTRARIAN TAKE - One bold angle that directly challenges industry conventional wisdom - The evidence or logic that supports it - Risk assessment: provocative enough to get shared, but defensible enough to withstand pushback 4. CONTENT SERIES CONCEPT - Connect 4-5 angles into a narrative arc that builds authority over time - Publishing cadence and platform strategy - How the series creates a reason to follow/subscribe
進階技巧
將 3 個競爭對手的標題和目標關鍵字的 AI 概覽結果一起餵給 AI。它會找到競爭對手未涵蓋且 AI 摘要無法完全提取的角度——這就是你的內容能真正持久的甘蜜點。
已測試 Mar 15, 2026
將一篇內容同時轉化為 15 個以上的平台原生素材
Repurpose this content across every relevant platform. Original content: [Paste blog post, video transcript, podcast notes, or long-form content] My platforms and audience sizes: - LinkedIn: [followers] - Twitter/X: [followers] - Instagram: [followers] - Email list: [subscribers, open rate] - YouTube: [subscribers] (if applicable) - TikTok: [followers] (if applicable) Repurpose into: 1. LINKEDIN (3 posts) - Post 1: Story hook — personal narrative + lesson - Post 2: Data/insight hook — surprising finding from the content - Post 3: Hot take hook — contrarian angle that drives comments - Each post: full text, hashtags, CTA, best day/time to post 2. TWITTER/X (2 threads + 5 standalone tweets) - Thread 1: Educational breakdown (8-10 tweets) - Thread 2: Story-driven narrative (6-8 tweets) - 5 standalone tweets: quotes, stats, questions from the content 3. EMAIL NEWSLETTER - Subject line (3 options with A/B testing rationale) - Preview text - Full newsletter draft (400-600 words, conversational) - CTA aligned with business goal 4. INSTAGRAM - Carousel outline (8-10 slides with text for each) - 3 Reels concepts (15-30 seconds each, with visual direction) - Caption for each with relevant hashtags 5. SHORT-FORM VIDEO (TikTok/Reels/Shorts) - 3 scripts (30-60 seconds each) - Hook in first 2 seconds - Visual direction and text overlay suggestions - Trending audio/format suggestions for the content type 6. PULL QUOTES & SHAREABLE ASSETS - 5 quotable one-liners for social sharing - 3 data visualizations or stat cards to create - Key takeaway formatted as an infographic outline
進階技巧
指定你在每個平台的粉絲數和互動率。500 粉絲的 LinkedIn 帳號和 50K 帳號需要不同的策略——AI 在知道你的受眾規模時會寫出很不同的內容,因為互動機制在每個規模都有所不同。
已測試 Mar 15, 2026
依平台和目標排名的 25 個吸睛引言
I need compelling hooks for content about: [topic] Target audience: [who they are and what keeps them up at night] Platform: [LinkedIn / Twitter / Instagram / Email / Blog / Video] Goal: [educate / sell / build authority / drive traffic / grow followers] Tone: [professional / casual / provocative / inspirational / empathetic] My unique angle: [what I know or have access to that others don't] Generate 25 hooks in 5 categories: 1. CURIOSITY GAP HOOKS (5) - Open a loop the reader can't help but want closed - Each should make someone think 'wait, what?' 2. DATA/PROOF HOOKS (5) - Lead with a specific, surprising number or finding - Suggest real data sources I could verify and cite - The number should challenge what the reader assumes 3. STORY HOOKS (5) - Open with a specific moment, not a generic scenario - No 'imagine this' or 'picture yourself' — drop into action - Each should be a micro-story completable in 2 sentences 4. CONTRARIAN HOOKS (5) - Challenge conventional wisdom in my industry - State the popular belief, then break it - Each should be defensible, not just provocative for clicks 5. OUTCOME HOOKS (5) - Promise a specific, measurable result - Include a timeframe or constraint that adds credibility - 'How I [specific result] in [timeframe] with [constraint]' Then: - Rank all 25 from strongest to weakest with reasoning - Tag each with best platform fit (some hooks work on LinkedIn but die on Twitter) - Flag which hooks need a visual/image to work vs. text-only - Identify the 3 hooks most likely to drive comments/replies
進階技巧
在用於內容之前,先把前 3 個引言當作電子郵件主旨行測試。郵件開信率能給你真實數據,知道哪些引言真正能停下滾動。大多數行銷人員猜測哪些引言有效——你可以用現有郵件清單免費測試。
已測試 Mar 15, 2026
為現有內容評分,精確知道需要多少工作量
Score this content and tell me the exact rewrite level needed. Content: [paste full text] Content type: [blog post / landing page / email / social post / guide] Target keyword: [primary keyword, if applicable] Business goal: [rank on Google / convert visitors / build authority / generate shares] Target audience: [who this is for] Original publish date: [when] Current performance: [traffic, rankings, conversion rate — whatever you have] Score across 4 dimensions (each out of 25, total out of 100): 1. RELEVANCE & ANGLE (25 pts) - Does this address what the audience actually needs right now? - Is the angle differentiated from competitors? - Is the core argument clear within the first 200 words? - Are there outdated references, stats, or advice? 2. CONTENT QUALITY (25 pts) - Depth vs. fluff ratio — how much is genuine insight vs. filler? - Original value: data, frameworks, case studies, first-hand experience - E-E-A-T signals: author expertise evident? Citations present? Real examples? - Voice quality: does this sound like an expert or a content mill? 3. STRUCTURE & UX (25 pts) - Heading hierarchy: logical, keyword-informed, scannable - Paragraph length and readability - CTA clarity and placement - Visual elements: does this need images, charts, or examples? 4. SEO & DISTRIBUTION (25 pts) - Keyword optimization (title, H1, meta, body) - Internal and external links - Schema opportunity - Shareability: would someone send this to a colleague? Classify rewrite level: - **Light Touch (80-100):** Minor tweaks — update stats, improve a headline, add 1-2 internal links - **Moderate (65-79):** Restructure + add 2-3 new sections, update examples, improve SEO - **Major (40-64):** Significant rewrite keeping best parts — new angle, expanded depth, fresh structure - **Complete (<40):** Start fresh — the topic is worth targeting but this content isn't salvageable For each dimension: specific fixes with before → after examples
進階技巧
在創建新內容之前,先對你最好的 10 篇內容運行這個評分器。大多數行銷人員坐擁已完成 60% 但埋在第 3 頁的內容。花 2 小時改寫已有權威和反向連結的內容,每次都比從零開始的新內容表現更好。
已測試 Mar 15, 2026
為任何文案格式建立轉換導向的簡報
Build a complete copywriting brief for: [type: landing page / ad / email sequence / sales page / product description] Product/service: [what you're selling] Price point: [cost and what's included] Target customer: [demographics, psychographics, current situation] Main pain point: [the specific problem your product solves] Main objection: [the #1 reason they don't buy] Competitors: [who else solves this problem and how you're different] Social proof: [testimonials, case studies, numbers you can reference] Deliver: 1. CUSTOMER AVATAR - Detailed paragraph: who they are, what they're feeling, what they've tried that didn't work - Their internal dialogue when they find your page - The transformation they want (before state → after state) 2. MESSAGING HIERARCHY - Primary value proposition (one sentence, crystal clear) - 3 supporting benefit statements with proof points - 3 objection-handling responses (address specific hesitations) 3. FULL COPY DRAFT - Headline (3 options: benefit-led, curiosity-led, proof-led) - Subheadline that qualifies the audience - Body copy following PAS (Problem-Agitation-Solution) or AIDA framework - Social proof section with specific formatting - CTA (3 options: direct, soft, urgency-based) - Guarantee/risk-reversal statement 4. A/B TEST PLAN - 2 alternative headline/CTA combinations - What each test isolates (messaging vs. urgency vs. social proof) - Success metric and minimum sample size to reach significance
進階技巧
在提示詞中加入一則真實的客戶推薦或客服工單。AI 會鏡像實際客戶的語言模式,產出聽起來像你的買家說話的文案——而不是行銷人員寫的。最好的文案用潛在客戶自己的語言來說服他們。
已測試 Mar 15, 2026
圍繞 4 個錨點內容建立 30 天策略性內容計畫
Build a strategic 30-day content calendar for my brand. Brand/business: [what you do] Platforms and posting frequency: - [Platform 1]: [X times per week] - [Platform 2]: [X times per week] - [Platform 3]: [X times per week] Content pillars: [3-5 themes you want to be known for] Business goals this month: [launch / awareness / leads / sales / community growth] Upcoming events or dates: [product launches, holidays, industry events] Team/resources: [solo creator / small team / agency — who makes the content] Biggest constraint: [time / ideas / consistency / distribution] Deliver: 1. 4 ANCHOR PIECES (one per week) - Long-form content that demonstrates expertise - Target keyword and search intent for each - How each anchor piece feeds derivative content for the week 2. 30-DAY CALENDAR GRID - Specific topic and format for every post on every platform - Content type mix: 40% educational, 25% storytelling, 20% engagement, 15% promotional - Which posts are original vs. repurposed from anchor pieces - Themed days or recurring series that build audience habits 3. PRODUCTION SCHEDULE - Batch creation days: when to write, film, design - Scheduling days: when to queue everything up - Engagement blocks: when to reply and interact - Time estimate per content piece 4. CONTINGENCY PLAN - 5 'evergreen' posts ready to fill gaps when you fall behind - Which posts to skip if you're short on time (and which to never skip) - How to repurpose one week's anchor into the next week's lighter content 5. SUCCESS METRICS - What to track per platform (not vanity metrics) - Weekly check-in: which post types to do more/less of based on data - Month-end review template
進階技巧
先圍繞 4 個錨點內容建立行事曆(每週一個),然後用衍生內容填滿其餘。大多數創作者反過來——先規劃每日貼文卻沒有內容主幹,導致隨機、脫節的內容永遠無法在任何主題上建立權威。
已測試 Mar 15, 2026
將客戶成果轉化為不推銷卻能賣的故事
Write a case study from these details. Client/customer: [industry, company size, role of decision maker — name if permitted] Their situation before: [what was broken, missing, or costing them] What they tried first: [solutions that didn't work and why] Our solution: [what you did, step by step] Results: [specific metrics, timeline, and ongoing impact] Client quote: [direct quote if available — even a rough paraphrase helps] Deliver: 1. HEADLINE OPTIONS (3) - Lead with the result, not the company name - Include a specific metric in the headline - Under 80 characters 2. FULL CASE STUDY (600-800 words) - Problem → Failed Attempts → Solution → Results → What's Next format - Written as a narrative, not a report — the reader should feel the frustration and relief - Specific enough to be credible, general enough for prospects in similar situations to self-identify 3. DERIVATIVE ASSETS - 2-sentence summary for the website portfolio page - LinkedIn post announcing the case study (with the most compelling stat as the hook) - 3 pull quotes formatted for social media graphics - Email snippet to use in sales follow-ups - Slide content for a sales deck (problem/solution/result in 3 slides) 4. SALES ENABLEMENT - 3 specific objections this case study addresses - Which stage of the sales funnel this case study is most powerful - How to reference it in a cold email (one sentence) - How to bring it up in a sales call (conversational script)
進階技巧
即使數字看起來很小,也要包含具體數據。「90 天內提升 23%」比「顯著改善」更有可信度和說服力。模糊的結果讓讀者認為你在隱藏什麼。如果沒有確切數字,使用範圍或相對改善。
已測試 Mar 15, 2026
確保你的內容無法被 AI 概覽完全取代
Analyze this content for AI-replacement vulnerability. My content: [paste full text] Target keyword: [primary keyword] Google's AI Overview for this keyword: [paste if available] Content format: [blog post / guide / landing page / resource] Business goal: [what this content needs to achieve] Run this analysis: 1. AI OVERVIEW VULNERABILITY SCAN - Which sections of my content could be fully summarized by an AI Overview? - Which sections contain information AI cannot generate (original data, first-hand experience, proprietary methodology)? - Overall vulnerability score: what percentage of this content's value can AI Overviews replicate? 2. DEFENSIBILITY AUDIT For each section, rate defensibility (High / Medium / Low): - High: original research, proprietary data, personal experience, unique methodology - Medium: curated expertise, specific examples, industry-specific nuance - Low: commonly available information, generic advice, definitions, basic how-tos 3. HARDENING RECOMMENDATIONS For every Low-defensibility section: - Specific way to inject original value (add a case study, share personal results, introduce a framework, cite proprietary data) - What to add that AI literally cannot fabricate - Whether to cut the section entirely if it can't be hardened 4. STRUCTURAL AI-PROOFING - Are key insights buried in paragraphs (easy to extract) or woven into narrative (hard to extract)? - Does the content structure reward reading the full piece, or can someone get 90% of the value from skimming? - Interactive elements, tools, or templates that can't be replicated in a text summary 5. REVISED CONTENT STRATEGY - Which 3 changes would most improve this content's defensibility? - What type of original content (data study, survey, expert interviews) would make this the definitive resource? - Is this keyword still worth targeting, or should you pivot to a less AI-vulnerable angle?
進階技巧
現在就在 Google 上搜尋你的目標關鍵字,看看是否出現 AI 概覽。如果有,將那個 AI 概覽和你的內容一起貼到這個提示詞中。AI 會告訴你哪些部分已被概覽涵蓋(使這些章節低價值),以及你有什麼是它沒有的(你的護城河)。
已測試 Mar 15, 2026
基於實際測試結果 — 非假設推測。 查看測試方法
Gemini 2.5 Pro
最擅長結構化內容規劃、行事曆和再利用工作流程。建立實際的製作時程表,並精確識別跨平台機會。在撰寫情感共鳴的敘事性文案方面最弱——用 Gemini 做策略,換其他模型寫文案。
規劃最佳選擇GPT-4.1
最擅長轉換導向的文案、引言產生和自然的跨平台內容。在 LinkedIn 正式和 Twitter 簡潔風格之間的語氣切換比其他模型更好。在案例研究和銷售文案方面表現出色。可能會冗長和公式化——請指定字數限制並要求它去掉企業腔。
文案最佳選擇Claude Sonnet 4
最擅長內容評分、AEO 防禦性分析和找到真正原創的角度。對你的內容是否真正增加價值或只是重述現有內容,提供最誠實的評估。特別擅長識別什麼讓內容無法被 AI 取代。
評分最佳選擇Grok 3
最擅長反向思考角度、尖銳引言和不像 AI 的獨特語氣。其直接性在擁擠的利基市場中能更好地突破泛泛的行銷話術。在識別過度使用的內容角度方面表現出色。對 B2B 品牌可能過於隨性。
反向思考角度最佳選擇從轉變開始,而非主題。在寫任何內容之前,完成這個句子:「在消化這個內容後,我的受眾會停止做 X,開始做 Y。」如果你填不出這個句子,你沒有內容——你有的是填充物。AI 在你給出明確的轉變目標而非只是主題時,產出的結果會好得多。
從長內容向下再利用,永遠不要從短內容向上。每週創建一個深入、權威的錨點內容(部落格文章、影片、Podcast),然後用多平台再利用器產生 10-15 個衍生內容。反方向操作——嘗試將推文擴展成文章——會產出缺乏深度的淺薄內容。
發布前永遠先評分。每篇內容在發布前都要過一次內容評分器。10 分鐘的評分能抓出泛泛填充、遺漏的 CTA 和 SEO 缺口,這些就是區分第 1 頁排名內容與消失在虛空中的內容的關鍵。