AI 提示詞: 內容創作

2026 年,能勝出的內容不是最多的——而是最不可替代的。AI 可以在幾秒內產生泛泛的部落格文章和社群標題,這意味著人類創建的內容門檻前所未有地高。這 8 個提示詞幫你找到 AI 概覽無法摘要的角度、將一篇內容再利用為 15 個以上的平台原生素材、依 100 分制評量表為現有內容評分,以及建立能轉換的文案,因為它鏡像了你客戶實際的說話方式。每個提示詞都是為了創建能贏得注意力而非只是填滿行事曆的內容。

最近測試日期 Mar 15, 2026 · 模型: GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4, Grok 3

內容角度發掘器

發現具 AEO 防禦性評分的差異化角度

I need unique content angles for: [topic/product/service]

Target audience: [who they are, their pain points, what they've already read]
My brand voice: [describe tone]
My unique advantage: [what makes your perspective different — data access, experience, methodology]
What competitors are saying: [paste 3-5 competitor headlines or angles]
AI Overview result for this topic: [paste what Google's AI Overview shows, if applicable]

Deliver:

1. 10 UNIQUE CONTENT ANGLES ranked by differentiation potential
   For each angle:
   - Headline (under 60 chars, scroll-stopping)
   - Core argument in 2 sentences
   - Why it resonates with [audience] specifically
   - AEO defensibility score (1-10): can an AI Overview fully summarize this angle? If 7+, it's defensible. If below 5, AI can replace it.

2. TOP 3 ANGLES — expanded:
   - Content format recommendation (long-form / thread / video / data study / interactive)
   - Distribution strategy (where to publish first, where to repurpose)
   - What original data, experience, or expertise makes this un-copyable
   - Estimated competitive difficulty vs. potential traffic

3. CONTRARIAN TAKE
   - One bold angle that directly challenges industry conventional wisdom
   - The evidence or logic that supports it
   - Risk assessment: provocative enough to get shared, but defensible enough to withstand pushback

4. CONTENT SERIES CONCEPT
   - Connect 4-5 angles into a narrative arc that builds authority over time
   - Publishing cadence and platform strategy
   - How the series creates a reason to follow/subscribe

進階技巧

將 3 個競爭對手的標題和目標關鍵字的 AI 概覽結果一起餵給 AI。它會找到競爭對手未涵蓋且 AI 摘要無法完全提取的角度——這就是你的內容能真正持久的甘蜜點。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

多平台再利用器

將一篇內容同時轉化為 15 個以上的平台原生素材

Repurpose this content across every relevant platform.

Original content:
[Paste blog post, video transcript, podcast notes, or long-form content]

My platforms and audience sizes:
- LinkedIn: [followers]
- Twitter/X: [followers]
- Instagram: [followers]
- Email list: [subscribers, open rate]
- YouTube: [subscribers] (if applicable)
- TikTok: [followers] (if applicable)

Repurpose into:

1. LINKEDIN (3 posts)
   - Post 1: Story hook — personal narrative + lesson
   - Post 2: Data/insight hook — surprising finding from the content
   - Post 3: Hot take hook — contrarian angle that drives comments
   - Each post: full text, hashtags, CTA, best day/time to post

2. TWITTER/X (2 threads + 5 standalone tweets)
   - Thread 1: Educational breakdown (8-10 tweets)
   - Thread 2: Story-driven narrative (6-8 tweets)
   - 5 standalone tweets: quotes, stats, questions from the content

3. EMAIL NEWSLETTER
   - Subject line (3 options with A/B testing rationale)
   - Preview text
   - Full newsletter draft (400-600 words, conversational)
   - CTA aligned with business goal

4. INSTAGRAM
   - Carousel outline (8-10 slides with text for each)
   - 3 Reels concepts (15-30 seconds each, with visual direction)
   - Caption for each with relevant hashtags

5. SHORT-FORM VIDEO (TikTok/Reels/Shorts)
   - 3 scripts (30-60 seconds each)
   - Hook in first 2 seconds
   - Visual direction and text overlay suggestions
   - Trending audio/format suggestions for the content type

6. PULL QUOTES & SHAREABLE ASSETS
   - 5 quotable one-liners for social sharing
   - 3 data visualizations or stat cards to create
   - Key takeaway formatted as an infographic outline

進階技巧

指定你在每個平台的粉絲數和互動率。500 粉絲的 LinkedIn 帳號和 50K 帳號需要不同的策略——AI 在知道你的受眾規模時會寫出很不同的內容,因為互動機制在每個規模都有所不同。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

引言產生器

依平台和目標排名的 25 個吸睛引言

I need compelling hooks for content about: [topic]

Target audience: [who they are and what keeps them up at night]
Platform: [LinkedIn / Twitter / Instagram / Email / Blog / Video]
Goal: [educate / sell / build authority / drive traffic / grow followers]
Tone: [professional / casual / provocative / inspirational / empathetic]
My unique angle: [what I know or have access to that others don't]

Generate 25 hooks in 5 categories:

1. CURIOSITY GAP HOOKS (5)
   - Open a loop the reader can't help but want closed
   - Each should make someone think 'wait, what?'

2. DATA/PROOF HOOKS (5)
   - Lead with a specific, surprising number or finding
   - Suggest real data sources I could verify and cite
   - The number should challenge what the reader assumes

3. STORY HOOKS (5)
   - Open with a specific moment, not a generic scenario
   - No 'imagine this' or 'picture yourself' — drop into action
   - Each should be a micro-story completable in 2 sentences

4. CONTRARIAN HOOKS (5)
   - Challenge conventional wisdom in my industry
   - State the popular belief, then break it
   - Each should be defensible, not just provocative for clicks

5. OUTCOME HOOKS (5)
   - Promise a specific, measurable result
   - Include a timeframe or constraint that adds credibility
   - 'How I [specific result] in [timeframe] with [constraint]'

Then:
- Rank all 25 from strongest to weakest with reasoning
- Tag each with best platform fit (some hooks work on LinkedIn but die on Twitter)
- Flag which hooks need a visual/image to work vs. text-only
- Identify the 3 hooks most likely to drive comments/replies

進階技巧

在用於內容之前,先把前 3 個引言當作電子郵件主旨行測試。郵件開信率能給你真實數據,知道哪些引言真正能停下滾動。大多數行銷人員猜測哪些引言有效——你可以用現有郵件清單免費測試。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

內容評分與改寫分類器

為現有內容評分,精確知道需要多少工作量

Score this content and tell me the exact rewrite level needed.

Content: [paste full text]
Content type: [blog post / landing page / email / social post / guide]
Target keyword: [primary keyword, if applicable]
Business goal: [rank on Google / convert visitors / build authority / generate shares]
Target audience: [who this is for]
Original publish date: [when]
Current performance: [traffic, rankings, conversion rate — whatever you have]

Score across 4 dimensions (each out of 25, total out of 100):

1. RELEVANCE & ANGLE (25 pts)
   - Does this address what the audience actually needs right now?
   - Is the angle differentiated from competitors?
   - Is the core argument clear within the first 200 words?
   - Are there outdated references, stats, or advice?

2. CONTENT QUALITY (25 pts)
   - Depth vs. fluff ratio — how much is genuine insight vs. filler?
   - Original value: data, frameworks, case studies, first-hand experience
   - E-E-A-T signals: author expertise evident? Citations present? Real examples?
   - Voice quality: does this sound like an expert or a content mill?

3. STRUCTURE & UX (25 pts)
   - Heading hierarchy: logical, keyword-informed, scannable
   - Paragraph length and readability
   - CTA clarity and placement
   - Visual elements: does this need images, charts, or examples?

4. SEO & DISTRIBUTION (25 pts)
   - Keyword optimization (title, H1, meta, body)
   - Internal and external links
   - Schema opportunity
   - Shareability: would someone send this to a colleague?

Classify rewrite level:
- **Light Touch (80-100):** Minor tweaks — update stats, improve a headline, add 1-2 internal links
- **Moderate (65-79):** Restructure + add 2-3 new sections, update examples, improve SEO
- **Major (40-64):** Significant rewrite keeping best parts — new angle, expanded depth, fresh structure
- **Complete (<40):** Start fresh — the topic is worth targeting but this content isn't salvageable

For each dimension: specific fixes with before → after examples

進階技巧

在創建新內容之前,先對你最好的 10 篇內容運行這個評分器。大多數行銷人員坐擁已完成 60% 但埋在第 3 頁的內容。花 2 小時改寫已有權威和反向連結的內容,每次都比從零開始的新內容表現更好。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

文案簡報建構器

為任何文案格式建立轉換導向的簡報

Build a complete copywriting brief for: [type: landing page / ad / email sequence / sales page / product description]

Product/service: [what you're selling]
Price point: [cost and what's included]
Target customer: [demographics, psychographics, current situation]
Main pain point: [the specific problem your product solves]
Main objection: [the #1 reason they don't buy]
Competitors: [who else solves this problem and how you're different]
Social proof: [testimonials, case studies, numbers you can reference]

Deliver:

1. CUSTOMER AVATAR
   - Detailed paragraph: who they are, what they're feeling, what they've tried that didn't work
   - Their internal dialogue when they find your page
   - The transformation they want (before state → after state)

2. MESSAGING HIERARCHY
   - Primary value proposition (one sentence, crystal clear)
   - 3 supporting benefit statements with proof points
   - 3 objection-handling responses (address specific hesitations)

3. FULL COPY DRAFT
   - Headline (3 options: benefit-led, curiosity-led, proof-led)
   - Subheadline that qualifies the audience
   - Body copy following PAS (Problem-Agitation-Solution) or AIDA framework
   - Social proof section with specific formatting
   - CTA (3 options: direct, soft, urgency-based)
   - Guarantee/risk-reversal statement

4. A/B TEST PLAN
   - 2 alternative headline/CTA combinations
   - What each test isolates (messaging vs. urgency vs. social proof)
   - Success metric and minimum sample size to reach significance

進階技巧

在提示詞中加入一則真實的客戶推薦或客服工單。AI 會鏡像實際客戶的語言模式,產出聽起來像你的買家說話的文案——而不是行銷人員寫的。最好的文案用潛在客戶自己的語言來說服他們。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

內容行事曆建構器

圍繞 4 個錨點內容建立 30 天策略性內容計畫

Build a strategic 30-day content calendar for my brand.

Brand/business: [what you do]
Platforms and posting frequency:
- [Platform 1]: [X times per week]
- [Platform 2]: [X times per week]
- [Platform 3]: [X times per week]
Content pillars: [3-5 themes you want to be known for]
Business goals this month: [launch / awareness / leads / sales / community growth]
Upcoming events or dates: [product launches, holidays, industry events]
Team/resources: [solo creator / small team / agency — who makes the content]
Biggest constraint: [time / ideas / consistency / distribution]

Deliver:

1. 4 ANCHOR PIECES (one per week)
   - Long-form content that demonstrates expertise
   - Target keyword and search intent for each
   - How each anchor piece feeds derivative content for the week

2. 30-DAY CALENDAR GRID
   - Specific topic and format for every post on every platform
   - Content type mix: 40% educational, 25% storytelling, 20% engagement, 15% promotional
   - Which posts are original vs. repurposed from anchor pieces
   - Themed days or recurring series that build audience habits

3. PRODUCTION SCHEDULE
   - Batch creation days: when to write, film, design
   - Scheduling days: when to queue everything up
   - Engagement blocks: when to reply and interact
   - Time estimate per content piece

4. CONTINGENCY PLAN
   - 5 'evergreen' posts ready to fill gaps when you fall behind
   - Which posts to skip if you're short on time (and which to never skip)
   - How to repurpose one week's anchor into the next week's lighter content

5. SUCCESS METRICS
   - What to track per platform (not vanity metrics)
   - Weekly check-in: which post types to do more/less of based on data
   - Month-end review template

進階技巧

先圍繞 4 個錨點內容建立行事曆(每週一個),然後用衍生內容填滿其餘。大多數創作者反過來——先規劃每日貼文卻沒有內容主幹,導致隨機、脫節的內容永遠無法在任何主題上建立權威。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

案例研究撰寫器

將客戶成果轉化為不推銷卻能賣的故事

Write a case study from these details.

Client/customer: [industry, company size, role of decision maker — name if permitted]
Their situation before: [what was broken, missing, or costing them]
What they tried first: [solutions that didn't work and why]
Our solution: [what you did, step by step]
Results: [specific metrics, timeline, and ongoing impact]
Client quote: [direct quote if available — even a rough paraphrase helps]

Deliver:

1. HEADLINE OPTIONS (3)
   - Lead with the result, not the company name
   - Include a specific metric in the headline
   - Under 80 characters

2. FULL CASE STUDY (600-800 words)
   - Problem → Failed Attempts → Solution → Results → What's Next format
   - Written as a narrative, not a report — the reader should feel the frustration and relief
   - Specific enough to be credible, general enough for prospects in similar situations to self-identify

3. DERIVATIVE ASSETS
   - 2-sentence summary for the website portfolio page
   - LinkedIn post announcing the case study (with the most compelling stat as the hook)
   - 3 pull quotes formatted for social media graphics
   - Email snippet to use in sales follow-ups
   - Slide content for a sales deck (problem/solution/result in 3 slides)

4. SALES ENABLEMENT
   - 3 specific objections this case study addresses
   - Which stage of the sales funnel this case study is most powerful
   - How to reference it in a cold email (one sentence)
   - How to bring it up in a sales call (conversational script)

進階技巧

即使數字看起來很小,也要包含具體數據。「90 天內提升 23%」比「顯著改善」更有可信度和說服力。模糊的結果讓讀者認為你在隱藏什麼。如果沒有確切數字,使用範圍或相對改善。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

抗 AI 內容檢查器

確保你的內容無法被 AI 概覽完全取代

Analyze this content for AI-replacement vulnerability.

My content: [paste full text]
Target keyword: [primary keyword]
Google's AI Overview for this keyword: [paste if available]
Content format: [blog post / guide / landing page / resource]
Business goal: [what this content needs to achieve]

Run this analysis:

1. AI OVERVIEW VULNERABILITY SCAN
   - Which sections of my content could be fully summarized by an AI Overview?
   - Which sections contain information AI cannot generate (original data, first-hand experience, proprietary methodology)?
   - Overall vulnerability score: what percentage of this content's value can AI Overviews replicate?

2. DEFENSIBILITY AUDIT
   For each section, rate defensibility (High / Medium / Low):
   - High: original research, proprietary data, personal experience, unique methodology
   - Medium: curated expertise, specific examples, industry-specific nuance
   - Low: commonly available information, generic advice, definitions, basic how-tos

3. HARDENING RECOMMENDATIONS
   For every Low-defensibility section:
   - Specific way to inject original value (add a case study, share personal results, introduce a framework, cite proprietary data)
   - What to add that AI literally cannot fabricate
   - Whether to cut the section entirely if it can't be hardened

4. STRUCTURAL AI-PROOFING
   - Are key insights buried in paragraphs (easy to extract) or woven into narrative (hard to extract)?
   - Does the content structure reward reading the full piece, or can someone get 90% of the value from skimming?
   - Interactive elements, tools, or templates that can't be replicated in a text summary

5. REVISED CONTENT STRATEGY
   - Which 3 changes would most improve this content's defensibility?
   - What type of original content (data study, survey, expert interviews) would make this the definitive resource?
   - Is this keyword still worth targeting, or should you pivot to a less AI-vulnerable angle?

進階技巧

現在就在 Google 上搜尋你的目標關鍵字,看看是否出現 AI 概覽。如果有,將那個 AI 概覽和你的內容一起貼到這個提示詞中。AI 會告訴你哪些部分已被概覽涵蓋(使這些章節低價值),以及你有什麼是它沒有的(你的護城河)。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

模型比較

基於實際測試結果 — 非假設推測。 查看測試方法

G

Gemini 2.5 Pro

最擅長結構化內容規劃、行事曆和再利用工作流程。建立實際的製作時程表,並精確識別跨平台機會。在撰寫情感共鳴的敘事性文案方面最弱——用 Gemini 做策略,換其他模型寫文案。

規劃最佳選擇
G

GPT-4.1

最擅長轉換導向的文案、引言產生和自然的跨平台內容。在 LinkedIn 正式和 Twitter 簡潔風格之間的語氣切換比其他模型更好。在案例研究和銷售文案方面表現出色。可能會冗長和公式化——請指定字數限制並要求它去掉企業腔。

文案最佳選擇
C

Claude Sonnet 4

最擅長內容評分、AEO 防禦性分析和找到真正原創的角度。對你的內容是否真正增加價值或只是重述現有內容,提供最誠實的評估。特別擅長識別什麼讓內容無法被 AI 取代。

評分最佳選擇
G

Grok 3

最擅長反向思考角度、尖銳引言和不像 AI 的獨特語氣。其直接性在擁擠的利基市場中能更好地突破泛泛的行銷話術。在識別過度使用的內容角度方面表現出色。對 B2B 品牌可能過於隨性。

反向思考角度最佳選擇

在 NailedIt 中試試

將上方的提示詞貼到 NailedIt,並排比較各模型的回應。

進階技巧

1

從轉變開始,而非主題。在寫任何內容之前,完成這個句子:「在消化這個內容後,我的受眾會停止做 X,開始做 Y。」如果你填不出這個句子,你沒有內容——你有的是填充物。AI 在你給出明確的轉變目標而非只是主題時,產出的結果會好得多。

2

從長內容向下再利用,永遠不要從短內容向上。每週創建一個深入、權威的錨點內容(部落格文章、影片、Podcast),然後用多平台再利用器產生 10-15 個衍生內容。反方向操作——嘗試將推文擴展成文章——會產出缺乏深度的淺薄內容。

3

發布前永遠先評分。每篇內容在發布前都要過一次內容評分器。10 分鐘的評分能抓出泛泛填充、遺漏的 CTA 和 SEO 缺口,這些就是區分第 1 頁排名內容與消失在虛空中的內容的關鍵。