AI 提示詞: 軟體開發

建構軟體不只是寫程式——而是做出會在數月和數年後複利累積的決策。這 8 個提示詞幫助你設計團隊真正能維護的架構、建立安全交付的 CI/CD 管線、撰寫開發者真正會讀的文件,以及策略性地償還技術債。已在 GPT-4.1、Gemini 2.5 Pro、Claude Sonnet 4 和 Grok 3 上測試,讓你知道哪個模型最擅長系統思考。

最近測試日期 Mar 15, 2026 · 模型: GPT-4.1, Gemini 2.5 Pro, Claude Sonnet 4, Grok 3

系統架構顧問

設計能擴展但不過度工程的系統

Help me design the architecture for a software system.

Project: [describe what you're building and the core problem it solves]
Scale: [current users, expected growth, data volume, peak traffic patterns]
Team: [size, seniority levels, language/framework expertise]
Tech constraints: [required technologies, cloud provider, existing systems to integrate with]
Budget: [infrastructure budget range — monthly]
Timeline: [MVP deadline, full launch date]
Non-functional requirements: [latency SLAs, uptime targets, compliance needs]

Design:
1. **High-level architecture:** describe each component, its responsibility, and how they communicate. Include a text-based diagram showing the flow
2. **Technology stack:** specific recommendation for each layer (language, framework, database, cache, queue, CDN) with reasoning. Flag where you're choosing simplicity over scalability intentionally
3. **Data model overview:** key entities, relationships, and which database type fits each (relational, document, key-value, graph)
4. **API design:** REST vs. GraphQL vs. gRPC for each communication path, with justification. Include auth strategy
5. **Scaling roadmap:** what changes at 100 users, 10K users, 100K users, 1M users. Specifically: what stays the same and what must change
6. **Top 5 architectural risks:** what could go wrong, how likely it is, and the mitigation strategy for each
7. **Decision record:** for the 3 biggest trade-offs, document what you chose, what you rejected, and why — so future developers understand the reasoning

進階技巧

在提示詞中加入你團隊現有的專業知識。為 2 名初級開發者的團隊推薦微服務架構是失敗的配方。AI 應該為你的團隊設計,而不是為假設的 Netflix 規模工程組織。最好的架構是能滿足你實際需求的最簡單架構。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

資料庫綱要設計師

設計針對你實際查詢方式優化的綱要

Help me design a database schema for my application.

Application: [describe what the app does and core user workflows]
Data types: [list the main entities you'll store]
Relationships: [how data connects: users have posts, orders have items, etc.]
Top 5 queries: [the most frequent reads and writes, with expected frequency]
Write patterns: [batch inserts? Real-time updates? Append-only?]
Scale: [current data volume, expected growth rate, peak write/read throughput]
Database: [PostgreSQL / MySQL / MongoDB / DynamoDB / undecided — explain preference]

Design:
1. **Complete schema:** tables/collections, columns/fields, types, constraints, and default values. Include CREATE TABLE statements
2. **Relationships:** primary keys, foreign keys, junction tables, and referential integrity rules. Explain each relationship
3. **Indexes:** specific indexes for your top 5 queries with CREATE INDEX statements. Explain what each index accelerates and the write overhead trade-off
4. **Normalization analysis:** where to normalize (data integrity) vs. denormalize (read performance). Justify each decision with your query patterns
5. **Migration strategy:** how to evolve this schema as requirements change without downtime. Include a versioning approach
6. **Query examples:** optimized SQL for your top 5 operations, using the indexes you designed
7. **Scaling plan:** when to add read replicas, partitioning, or sharding — and the specific table/query that will hit limits first

進階技巧

在設計綱要之前先列出你的前 5 個查詢。綱要設計應該由你如何「讀取」數據來驅動,而不只是如何寫入。當 AI 知道你的存取模式時,會設計出明顯更好的索引和反正規化策略。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

CI/CD 管線建構器

透過自動化的建構、測試和部署安全交付程式碼

Help me set up a CI/CD pipeline for my project.

Project type: [web app / API / mobile / library / monorepo]
Stack: [languages, frameworks, build tools, test frameworks]
Source control: [GitHub / GitLab / Bitbucket]
Deploy target: [AWS / GCP / Azure / Vercel / Railway / Docker / Kubernetes]
Current deployment: [describe how you deploy now — even if it's manual]
Team size: [number of developers and deployment frequency]
Test suite: [what tests exist and how long they take]
Secrets: [env vars, API keys, certificates that need to be managed]

Build:
1. **Pipeline configuration:** complete YAML file for your CI/CD platform with comments explaining each step
2. **Stage design:** build → lint → test → security scan → deploy. Specific commands for each with failure handling
3. **Branch strategy:** main/develop/feature branches with merge rules, required checks, and auto-deploy triggers
4. **Environment management:** dev → staging → production configuration. What differs between environments and how secrets are injected
5. **Deployment strategy:** blue-green, rolling, or canary — with justification for your scale and risk tolerance
6. **Rollback procedure:** how to revert a bad deployment in under 5 minutes. Specific commands and verification steps
7. **Monitoring hooks:** what to check after each deployment (health checks, smoke tests, error rate comparison)

進階技巧

加入你當前的部署流程,即使是「SSH 進伺服器然後執行 git pull」。AI 在知道你的起始點時能建構更好的管線,並建議漸進式改進。一次從手動跳到完全自動化通常會失敗——漸進式自動化才能持久。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

測試策略架構師

建立能在用戶之前捕捉錯誤的測試文化

Help me build a comprehensive testing strategy for my project.

Project type: [web app / mobile / API / library / CLI]
Stack: [languages, frameworks, testing tools already in use]
Current coverage: [percentage or 'none' — be honest]
Team testing culture: [strong / weak / nonexistent / 'we write tests but they're bad']
Most critical features: [the 3-5 things that absolutely cannot break]
CI/CD: [what you use for continuous integration]
Pain points: [flaky tests? Slow test suite? Hard to write tests? No one reviews test quality?]

Design:
1. **Testing pyramid for your stack:** specific ratio of unit/integration/e2e tests with reasoning. Include which framework/tool for each layer
2. **Priority test list:** the first 10 tests to write, ranked by 'what's the worst thing that could happen if this breaks?' Include the test description and what it validates
3. **Testing patterns:** conventions to adopt (arrange-act-assert, test data factories, fixture management, mocking strategy). Include code examples in your stack
4. **5 example tests:** for your most critical feature, complete test code with setup, execution, and assertions
5. **CI integration:** how to run tests automatically, fail fast on critical tests, and parallelize slow suites
6. **Coverage roadmap:** realistic 30/60/90 day plan to reach meaningful coverage. Not just a percentage target — which parts of the codebase to cover first and why
7. **Test quality checks:** how to prevent tests that pass but don't actually verify anything (assertion-free tests, overly broad mocks, testing implementation details)

進階技巧

從關鍵用戶路徑的整合測試開始,而不是工具函數的單元測試。整合測試能捕捉到真正會破壞你產品的錯誤。你可以之後再補寫單元測試。如果你的團隊討厭寫測試,問題通常在測試基礎設施,而不是紀律——先讓測試容易寫。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

技術債策略師

識別、排優先級並系統性地償還技術債

Help me assess and strategically pay down technical debt in my project.

Project age: [how long in development]
Team size: [developers working on it]
Known pain points: [parts of the codebase everyone avoids or fears touching]
Recent incidents: [bugs, outages, or delays caused by old code]
Upcoming features: [what you need to build in the next 2-3 months]
Current tech stack: [languages, frameworks, dependency versions]
Dependency age: [when were major dependencies last updated?]
Test coverage: [current state]

Provide:
1. **Debt inventory framework:** categories (code quality, architecture, dependencies, testing, documentation, infrastructure) with specific questions to audit each
2. **Risk assessment:** for each category, what's the worst realistic outcome if this debt isn't addressed? Rank by business impact, not engineering aesthetics
3. **Prioritization matrix:** plot each debt item on impact (how much it slows the team) vs. effort (how long to fix). Identify the sweet spot: high impact, low effort
4. **Sprint allocation model:** how to dedicate 20% of each sprint to debt without sacrificing feature velocity. Specific negotiation language for product managers
5. **Quick wins:** 5 debt items fixable in under a day each with disproportionate impact. Include the specific action for each
6. **Dependency audit:** which dependencies are dangerously outdated, which have known vulnerabilities, and the upgrade priority order
7. **Stakeholder communication:** how to explain tech debt to non-technical leadership in terms of business risk, velocity impact, and ROI of paying it down

進階技巧

討論技術債時加入你即將到來的功能路線圖。債務應該根據是否阻擋未來工作來排優先級,而不是抽象的「整潔度」。重構你永遠不會再碰的程式碼雖然滿足但浪費時間。重構你下個 sprint 要建構在上面的程式碼才是投資。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

技術文件撰寫器

寫出開發者真正會讀且會維護的文件

Help me write technical documentation for [system/API/library/process].

**What I'm documenting:** [describe the system, feature, or process]
**Audience:** [new team members / external developers / ops team / all of the above]
**Current docs:** [none / outdated / scattered across Slack and PRs / exists but nobody reads it]
**Documentation tool:** [Notion / Confluence / README.md / Docusaurus / GitBook / other]
**Key complexity:** [what's the hardest thing to understand about this system?]

Create:
1. **Architecture overview:** high-level explanation of how the system works, aimed at someone joining the team. Include a text diagram of components and data flow
2. **Getting started guide:** from zero to 'I can run this locally and make a change' in under 30 minutes. Every command, every env var, every gotcha
3. **API reference:** for each endpoint or interface, the request/response format, auth requirements, error codes, and a curl/code example
4. **Decision log (ADRs):** template for Architecture Decision Records. Pre-fill with the 3 most important decisions already made and their reasoning
5. **Troubleshooting guide:** the 5 most common issues new developers hit, with symptoms and fixes
6. **Maintenance guide:** how to update dependencies, run migrations, deploy, rollback, and monitor. The runbook for when things go wrong at 2am

進階技巧

最好的文件是在你理解某件事的當下寫的,而不是專案交付之後。如果你正在向新團隊成員解釋一個系統到發現沒有文件——那次對話就「是」文件草稿。錄下來讓 AI 結構化它。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

PR 描述與 Commit 撰寫器

寫出讓審查者生活更輕鬆的 PR 描述

Help me write a clear PR description and commit messages for this change.

**What changed:**
```diff
[Paste the git diff or describe the changes]
```

**Why:** [the problem this solves, the feature this implements, or the tech debt this addresses]
**How:** [the approach you took and why you chose it over alternatives]
**Testing:** [how you tested this — manual steps, automated tests added, edge cases verified]
**Risks:** [what could go wrong, backward compatibility concerns, migration needs]
**Related:** [issue/ticket numbers, related PRs, Slack discussions]

Generate:
1. **PR title:** concise, follows conventional format (feat/fix/refactor/docs/chore), under 72 characters
2. **PR description:** structured with Summary, Changes, Testing, and Risks sections. Enough context that a reviewer who doesn't know the codebase can understand the change
3. **Commit messages:** if the PR should be split into multiple commits, suggest the breakdown with a message for each following conventional commits format
4. **Reviewer guidance:** which files to review most carefully, which changes are mechanical/safe to skim, and what specific feedback you want
5. **Checklist:** a PR checklist tailored to this change (tests added, docs updated, migration needed, feature flag required, monitoring added)

進階技巧

一個好的 PR 描述節省的時間比寫它花的時間更多。理解你變更「為什麼」的審查者會給出更好的回饋、更快批准,並捕捉到實際的錯誤而不是在風格問題上爭論。對於 UI 變更要附上截圖——閱讀程式碼比看結果慢 10 倍。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

新語言入門器

快速在新的程式語言中變得有生產力

Help me get productive in a new programming language quickly.

New language: [the language you want to learn]
Languages I already know well: [your current languages and years of experience]
Goal: [build a specific project / switch jobs / contribute to an open-source project / expand skills]
Specific domain: [web backend / frontend / systems / mobile / data / ML / DevOps]
Timeline: [how quickly I need to be writing production code]
Learning style: [build projects / read docs / solve problems / watch videos]

Create:
1. **Concept mapping:** 'In [known language], you do X. In [new language], the equivalent is Y.' Cover the 15 most important concepts (variables, functions, error handling, concurrency, package management, testing, types)
2. **The 20/80 syntax guide:** the 20% of syntax that covers 80% of daily coding. No encyclopedic reference — just what I need to be productive
3. **First weekend project:** a hands-on project that teaches core language features (not Hello World — something that touches the file system, makes HTTP requests, handles errors, and uses the package manager)
4. **Gotcha guide:** 10 mistakes developers from [known language] make in [new language], with the correct pattern for each
5. **Ecosystem essentials:** the ONE package manager, test framework, linter, formatter, and build tool to use (not 5 options for each — just the default choice)
6. **Progression path:** after the first weekend, what to learn next in order of usefulness. Focus on the language's unique strengths, not just reimplementing what you already know

進階技巧

加入你「從哪裡來」的語言,而不只是你想學的語言。一個 Python 開發者學 Rust 和一個 C++ 開發者學 Rust 需要完全不同的解釋。AI 會根據你已經理解的模式來定制範例,讓心智模型轉移更快。

已測試 Mar 15, 2026

模型比較

基於實際測試結果 — 非假設推測。 查看測試方法

G

Gemini 2.5 Pro

最擅長資料庫設計、CI/CD 設定和新語言入門。產出索引完善的綱要,具備清晰的遷移策略。產生準確的平台特定 YAML 設定檔。對架構權衡較不明確——給選項而 Claude 給建議。

資料庫設計最佳選擇
G

GPT-4.1

最擅長 CI/CD 管線、測試策略和技術文件。產生最接近生產環境的設定檔和框架感知的測試套件。對 DevOps 工具和雲服務的知識最廣泛。可能會為小專案過度工程——請指定你的規模。

CI/CD 管線最佳選擇
C

Claude Sonnet 4

最擅長架構決策、技術債評估和 PR 審查。提供最誠實的權衡分析,並在每個建議中考慮團隊能力。其技術債優先級排序最具策略價值——以業務影響優先,而非工程美學。

架構決策最佳選擇
G

Grok 3

提供最務實、不囉唆的架構建議。能看穿過度工程,推薦最簡單可行的方案。在 commit 訊息和 PR 描述方面語言清晰直接。在企業級模式和合規性強的基礎設施方面不夠深入。

務實建議最佳選擇

在 NailedIt 中試試

將上方的提示詞貼到 NailedIt,並排比較各模型的回應。

進階技巧

1

為你的團隊設計,而不是為部落格文章設計。最好的架構是你的團隊能夠建構和維護的那個。2 人團隊用微服務或 100 個用戶用 Kubernetes 是過度工程。告訴 AI 你的團隊規模和技能等級,這樣它會推薦符合你實際規模需求的最簡單架構。

2

記錄決策,而不只是程式碼。註解解釋程式碼做什麼。架構決策記錄(ADR)解釋「為什麼」你選擇這個方案而不是其他替代方案。當未來的開發者問「為什麼這樣建構?」ADR 可以在不需要開會的情況下回答。

3

測試是投資,不是稅。每花一小時寫好的測試,後續能節省 3-5 小時的除錯時間。從關鍵用戶路徑的整合測試開始,而不是追求工具函數的 100% 單元測試覆蓋率。