💡 AIモデルは英語のプロンプトで最も高い精度を発揮します。そのため、プロンプト本文は英語のまま掲載しています。英語で入力することで、より正確で詳細な回答が得られます。 データは解釈なしではただのノイズです。そして2026年、2年前には存在しなかった指標を追跡する必要があります。これらの8つのプロンプトは、アナリティクスの全領域をカバーしています:意思決定を中心に構築されたマーケティングダッシュボード(バニティメトリクスではなく)、次に何をすべきかを教えてくれるキャンペーン分析(何が起きたかではなく)、ChatGPTやPerplexityの引用に関するAI可視性トラッキング、4つのビジネスインパクト次元でのコンテンツパフォーマンス評価、そして経営層が実際に読むエグゼクティブレポート。すべてのプロンプトは、数字を収益を生む意思決定に変えるために設計されています。
プロンプト
データを表示するだけでなく、意思決定を促すマーケティングダッシュボードを構築する
Design a marketing dashboard for [business type]. Channels I use: [list all active marketing channels] Reporting frequency: [daily / weekly / monthly] Dashboard audience: [CEO / marketing team / client / board] Current tools: [Google Analytics, HubSpot, Semrush, etc.] Biggest question leadership always asks: [what they want to know] Current pain point: [what's wrong with your existing reporting] Design: 1. TOP ROW: 5-7 KPIs that matter most - Metric name, definition, and target benchmark - Visualization type (number with trend arrow, gauge, sparkline) - Red/yellow/green thresholds - Why each KPI is here (what decision does it inform?) 2. CHANNEL BREAKDOWN - Supporting metrics organized by channel - Comparison views: this period vs. last period vs. goal - The exact chart type for each metric (line for trends, bar for comparison, pie for composition) 3. EARLY WARNING INDICATORS - 3 leading metrics that predict problems 2-4 weeks before they hit revenue - Alert thresholds: when to investigate vs. when to act - What each indicator means when it moves 4. REPORT AUTOMATION - Which data sources feed into this dashboard - Refresh frequency per data source - A 3-minute walkthrough script for presenting this dashboard - Questions to pre-answer before every reporting meeting 5. ANTI-VANITY METRIC CHECK - Which commonly tracked metrics should NOT be on this dashboard and why - The difference between a metric that feels important and one that drives a decision
プロのコツ
プロンプトにダッシュボードの閲覧者を含めましょう。CEOダッシュボードは5つの指標と信号機インジケーターで構成されます。マーケティングチームのダッシュボードは20の指標とドリルダウンビューが必要です。AIは閲覧者の意思決定コンテキストを知らなければ、適切なダッシュボードを設計できません。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
キャンペーンデータから要約ではなく実行可能なインサイトを抽出する
Analyze these campaign results and tell me exactly what to do next. [Paste campaign data: impressions, clicks, conversions, spend, CTR, CPC, ROAS by day/week] Campaign type: [paid ads / email / social / content / SEO] Campaign goal: [awareness / leads / sales / engagement] Total budget: [spend] Time period: [how long the campaign ran] Benchmarks: [industry averages or your historical averages] What you expected: [what you thought would happen] Analyze across 4 dimensions: 1. PERFORMANCE DIAGNOSIS - What worked and what didn't (specific, with data evidence) - The single biggest lever to improve results - Trend analysis: is performance improving, declining, or plateauing? - Fatigue indicators: when did performance start dropping off? 2. BUDGET OPTIMIZATION - Current spend allocation vs. recommended reallocation (with exact percentages) - Which segments/audiences/creatives deserve more budget - Which should be paused or killed - Expected impact of reallocation on key metrics 3. HYPOTHESIS GENERATION - 3 specific hypotheses for why underperforming elements failed - How to test each hypothesis in the next campaign cycle - What additional data would help diagnose issues you can't explain 4. ACTION PLAN - Stop: what to kill immediately (with reasoning) - Start: new approaches to test based on what the data suggests - Continue: what to keep doing and why - Timeline: specific next steps for the next 7 and 30 days
プロのコツ
合計値だけでなく、少なくとも2週間分の日次データを含めましょう。AIは曜日パターン、疲弊曲線、オーディエンスの飽和、トレンドの変化を検出しますが、これらは集計数値では完全に消えてしまいます。合計は何が起きたかを教えてくれますが、日次データはなぜ起きたかを教えてくれます。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
実際にコンバージョンを促進しているチャネルを理解する
Help me understand which marketing channels actually drive my results. Channels and monthly spend: [Channel 1]: $[spend] → [conversions attributed] [Channel 2]: $[spend] → [conversions attributed] [Channel 3]: $[spend] → [conversions attributed] [Channel 4]: $[spend] → [conversions attributed] Sales cycle: [average days from first touch to conversion] Conversion tracking: [what I can currently measure and where I have gaps] CRM/tools: [platforms I use] Biggest attribution confusion: [the specific question I can't answer] Business type: [B2B / B2C / ecommerce / SaaS / services] Advise: 1. ATTRIBUTION MODEL SELECTION - Which model fits my business (first-touch, last-touch, linear, time-decay, position-based) - Why this model over others for my sales cycle length and channel mix - What each model would tell me vs. miss 2. IMPLEMENTATION PLAN - How to set this up in my current tools (specific steps) - UTM parameter strategy for consistent tracking - What data I need to start collecting now 3. CHANNEL INTERACTION ANALYSIS - Likely assist channels (touch points that rarely convert directly but enable other channels) - Channels that look good in last-touch but overstate their impact - Channels that look bad but are undervalued 4. DARK FUNNEL HANDLING - How to account for channels that can't be directly attributed (word of mouth, brand, podcast, PR) - Proxy metrics and survey-based attribution methods - 'How did you hear about us?' survey design 5. DECISION FRAMEWORK - How to present attribution findings to stakeholders who want simple answers - Budget reallocation recommendations based on this analysis - When to revisit and recalibrate the model
プロのコツ
アトリビューションは常に間違っています — 目標は「より間違いを少なくすること」です。完璧なモデルではなく、まず「方向性として正しい」モデルを構築するようAIに依頼しましょう。完璧なアトリビューションは幻想であり、意思決定を遅らせます。毎月80%正確な配分判断を行う企業は、モデルの議論を続けている企業よりも優れたパフォーマンスを発揮します。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
人々が質問した際にAIモデルがあなたのブランドに言及しているかを測定する
Build an AI visibility monitoring system for my brand. Brand/company: [name and what you do] Core topics: [5-10 topics where you want to be cited] Key competitors: [who currently gets cited instead of you] Current AI visibility: [do ChatGPT / Perplexity / Google AI Overviews mention you? Where?] Content assets: [what you've published that AI could reference] Build a tracking system: 1. QUERY INVENTORY - 20 high-value queries to monitor monthly (the questions your ideal customer asks AI) - For each: which AI platforms to check (ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overview, Bing Copilot) - Categorize: brand mentioned / competitor mentioned / neither mentioned 2. BASELINE AUDIT - Run all 20 queries now across platforms - Document: who gets cited, what sources are referenced, what claims are made - Identify your 'citation gap': queries where competitors appear and you don't 3. CITATION SIGNAL ANALYSIS - What content your competitors have that's getting them cited (Reddit posts, blog articles, YouTube videos, Wikipedia mentions) - What content you need to create to earn citations - Which platforms feed most into each AI model (Reddit → ChatGPT, YouTube → Gemini, etc.) 4. MONTHLY TRACKING ROUTINE (15 minutes) - Spreadsheet template with queries, platforms, and citation status - How to efficiently check all 20 queries across platforms - What changes to track month-over-month - When to escalate (competitor gains, your citations disappear, misinformation) 5. ACTION PRIORITIES - Top 5 content pieces to create or update for maximum citation impact - Platform-specific strategies (Reddit answers, YouTube descriptions, structured blog content) - Timeline: realistic expectations for when citations start appearing
プロのコツ
この監査は毎月実施しましょう。AIモデルの回答は新しい学習データで更新されるたびに変化します。今日ChatGPTで見えないブランドも、適切なコンテンツとシグナルを構築すれば来月には引用される可能性があります。単一のスナップショットではなく、推移を追跡しましょう。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
4次元の評価基準ですべてのコンテンツを採点する
Score my content portfolio and tell me where to focus. Content inventory (for each piece, include what you have): [Paste a table: Title, URL, Monthly Traffic, Conversions, Bounce Rate, Avg Time on Page, Backlinks, Social Shares] Business goals: [what content should ultimately drive] Time available for content improvement: [hours per week] Score each piece across 4 dimensions: 1. TRAFFIC PERFORMANCE (25 pts) - Organic traffic trend (growing, stable, declining) - Traffic relative to effort invested - Keyword rankings and position trajectory - Click-through rate from search results 2. ENGAGEMENT QUALITY (25 pts) - Time on page vs. content length (are people actually reading?) - Bounce rate in context (informational pages bounce high — that's okay) - Social shares and backlinks earned - Comments and direct responses 3. BUSINESS IMPACT (25 pts) - Conversions attributed to this content - Role in the customer journey (top of funnel vs. decision stage) - Revenue influence (direct and assisted) - Email signups or other micro-conversions 4. COMPETITIVE POSITION (25 pts) - How this ranks vs. competitor content on the same topic - Content freshness (last updated date vs. competitors) - Unique value that competitors can't easily replicate - AI Overview vulnerability: is AI summarizing this topic away? Deliver: - Ranked list: top performers, underperformers, and candidates for retirement - Top 5 pieces to update (highest ROI per hour invested) - Top 3 content gaps (topics you should cover but don't) - Kill list: content that should be consolidated, redirected, or removed
プロのコツ
トラフィックだけを評価しないでください。10,000訪問でコンバージョンがゼロのページは、500訪問で50リードのページよりも悪い結果です。AIがバニティメトリクスではなくビジネスインパクトでコンテンツを評価できるよう、トラフィックデータと合わせてコンバージョンデータもプロンプトに含めましょう。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
顧客を失っている正確な箇所を見つけ、最大の漏れから修正する
Find and fix the leaks in my conversion funnel. Funnel stages with conversion rates: [Stage 1]: [name] — [number entering] — [conversion rate to next stage] [Stage 2]: [name] — [number entering] — [conversion rate to next stage] [Stage 3]: [name] — [number entering] — [conversion rate to next stage] [Stage 4]: [name] — [number entering] — [final conversion rate] Industry: [your industry] Average order value / deal size: [revenue per conversion] Traffic sources: [where visitors come from, with volume per source] Known friction points: [what you already suspect is causing drop-off] Analyze: 1. LEAK IDENTIFICATION - Which stage has the biggest absolute leak (most people lost) - Which stage has the biggest rate leak (worst conversion rate vs. benchmark) - Which leak, if fixed, would generate the most revenue? (this is the priority) 2. BENCHMARK COMPARISON - How my rates compare to industry averages at each stage - Which stages are healthy and which need attention - Segment analysis: do specific traffic sources have much worse funnel flow? 3. DIAGNOSIS per leaky stage - 3 most likely causes of drop-off (with reasoning) - Micro-conversion additions between stages to pinpoint friction - User experience issues to investigate (page load, form length, clarity) 4. FIX PLAN - Top 3 fixes for the biggest leak, ranked by effort vs. impact - Expected improvement range for each fix (realistic, with confidence level) - A/B test designs to validate each fix before full rollout 5. 2-WEEK EXPERIMENT - A specific experiment to improve the weakest stage by 15%+ - What to measure, when to measure, and how to know if it worked - Fallback plan if the experiment doesn't move the needle
プロのコツ
常に収益に最も近い、最も漏れの大きいステージから修正しましょう。ファネル下部の10%改善は、ファネル上部の10%改善よりも即座に多くの収益を生み出します。しかしAIは絶対数が大きく見えるため、トップオブファネルを優先しがちです。ボリュームではなく、収益インパクトで最適化するよう指示しましょう。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
時間経過に伴う顧客行動の隠れたパターンを明らかにする
Help me build and interpret a cohort analysis for [business/product]. Cohort definition: [how to group users — signup month, acquisition channel, plan type, first purchase category] Key metric to track: [retention rate / revenue per user / feature adoption / repeat purchase rate] Time period: [how far back to analyze] Data I have: [describe available data fields and where they live] Goal: [reduce churn / increase LTV / improve activation / optimize channel spend] Build: 1. COHORT TABLE DESIGN - Row structure: what defines each cohort - Column structure: time periods to track - The exact formulas to calculate cohort metrics (for Sheets/Excel/SQL) - Color-coding rules for quick pattern recognition 2. HOW TO READ THE TABLE - What healthy cohort curves look like vs. warning signs - The 'banana chart' visualization and how to interpret it - Specific patterns to look for (early churn, delayed activation, seasonal effects) 3. INSIGHT EXTRACTION - 5 questions to answer from this cohort data - What to compare: channel cohorts vs. time cohorts vs. behavior cohorts - How to identify your 'best customers' by cohort behavior - Signals that predict which new users will become high-value 4. ACTION FRAMEWORK - If early churn is high: specific interventions for the first 7/30/90 days - If retention curves flatten late: expansion and upsell strategies - If certain cohorts dramatically outperform: how to acquire more of those users - Budget reallocation based on true cohort LTV (not just acquisition cost) 5. PRESENTATION FORMAT - How to visualize cohort findings for different audiences (executive vs. team) - The 3 most compelling slides from this analysis - How to update this analysis monthly in under 30 minutes
プロのコツ
獲得チャネルごとに月次コホートから始めましょう。この1つの分析で、「最良の」チャネル(最大ボリューム)が最悪のリテンションを持っていることがしばしば判明し、予算配分を完全に変えることになります。コホート分析はバニティメトリクスを実行可能な戦略に変えます。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
データの要約ではなく、意思決定を促す月次レポートを作成する
Generate my monthly marketing report from this data. [Paste key metrics: traffic, leads, conversions, revenue, spend by channel, month-over-month changes] Reporting month: [month/year] Previous month data: [for comparison] Goals for this month: [targets that were set] Report audience: [CEO / board / marketing team / client] Key context: [anything unusual this month — campaigns launched, market changes, team changes] Create: 1. EXECUTIVE SUMMARY (4 sentences max) - Lead with the headline: did we hit goals or not? - The single most important insight - The single biggest concern - One-sentence recommendation 2. GOALS vs. ACTUALS TABLE - Each goal with target, actual, and status (green/yellow/red) - Trend arrows showing direction - Brief explanation for any red or yellow items 3. CHANNEL PERFORMANCE - Each channel: spend, results, ROAS/CPA, trend vs. last month - Highlight the best-performing and worst-performing channels - Budget reallocation recommendation if applicable 4. TOP 3 WINS (with evidence) - What worked, why it worked, and how to replicate it - Specific data points that prove the win 5. TOP 3 CONCERNS (with recommended actions) - What's not working and what you plan to do about it - Don't just flag problems — propose solutions with timelines 6. NEXT MONTH PREVIEW - Planned initiatives and expected outcomes - Risks and dependencies - Resource or budget requests (if any) 7. ONE CHART - The single most compelling visualization from this month's data - What it shows and why it matters - How to present it in 30 seconds
プロのコツ
各セクションは「何が起きたか」ではなく「だから何なのか」から始めましょう。経営層はデータの要約ではなく、データを使って何をすべきかを知りたいのです。すべてのインサイトは推奨アクションを先に提示し、データで裏付けるようAIに指示しましょう。アクションファーストのレポートは、経営層のマーケティングに対する見方を変えます。
テスト済み Mar 15, 2026
実際のテストに基づいています — 推測ではありません。 テスト方法を見る
Gemini 2.5 Pro
ダッシュボード設計、コホート分析、Google Analytics固有のレポートに最適。実装準備が整ったスプレッドシートの数式、SQLクエリ、Looker Studioの設定を作成します。Googleのアナリティクスエコシステムに対する最も深い理解を持っています。ナラティブ解釈はやや弱い。
ダッシュボードに最適GPT-4.1
アトリビューションモデリング、エグゼクティブレポート、複雑なアナリティクス概念をわかりやすい言葉で説明するのに最適。非技術者のステークホルダーが理解し行動できるレポートを作成します。実行可能な提案を伴うキャンペーンパフォーマンス分析に強い。
レポートに最適Claude Sonnet 4
キャンペーン診断、AI可視性分析、ファネル最適化に最適。データが実際に何を示しているか vs あなたが示してほしいことについて、最も正直な評価を提供します。相関と因果関係の区別やサンプルサイズの不足の指摘に優れています。
診断に最適Grok 3
バニティメトリクスを見抜き、本当に重要なものを特定するのに最適。新鮮な直接性でインサイトを提供し、パフォーマンス不振を美化しません。データ内の非自明なパターンの発見に強い。フォーマルなレポートフレームワークへの注力は少ない。
ノイズの排除に最適従来のSEOと並行してAI可視性を追跡しましょう。2026年、Googleでのランキングだけでなく、ChatGPT、Perplexity、AI Overviewがあなたのスペースに関する質問でブランドに言及しているかを把握する必要があります。AI可視性トラッカーを毎月使用しましょう — この指標は1年以内にオーガニックトラフィックと同等の重要性を持つようになります。
業界ベンチマークではなく、自社との比較をしましょう。業界平均コンバージョン率には、あなたとはまったく異なる企業が含まれています。あなた自身の月次トレンドの方が、業界の「平均」メール開封率を知るよりも実行可能です。AIはコンテキストなしで数字を良いか悪いか提示します — 常に自社の過去のデータとの比較を含めるよう指示しましょう。
すべてではなく、意思決定を測定しましょう。ある指標があなたが下す意思決定を変えないなら、追跡をやめましょう。ほとんどのダッシュボードには30以上の指標がありますが、影響を与えるアクションはゼロです。次のアクションを実際に促す5つの指標を特定するようAIに依頼しましょう — それだけがダッシュボードの最上段に配置されるべき指標です。